Hopi vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hopi
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hopi
Turks
7.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hopi vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,623,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 64.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hopi | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 21.7% | 16.2% |
| Range | 20.0% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 4.6% |
| Median | 8.1% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hopi by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Armenia (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (7.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and British West Indian (7.1%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |