Choctaw vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Choctaw
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Choctaw
Pima
21.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,369,694 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 33.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Pima |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 94.7% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 33.5% | 41.2% |
| Median | 26.8% | 34.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.4% | 57.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 36.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.12%), British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |