Immigrants from Brazil vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Pima
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 337,270,761 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 87.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Pima |
Minimum | 1.6% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.1% | 89.0% |
Mean | 15.1% | 41.2% |
Median | 13.8% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |