Choctaw vs Pima No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Choctaw
Pima
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Choctaw
Pima
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Pima No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,114,362 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,491,377 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 79.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 29.6% |
| Range | 15.4% | 27.1% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 14.4% |
| Median | 6.4% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Spanish (7.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Northern European (7.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Okinawan (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Indian (Asian) (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Jamaica (14.2%, a difference of 0.66%), Belizean (14.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Paraguayan (14.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.7% |