Choctaw vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Choctaw
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Choctaw
Pima
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,650,989 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 80.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 74.8%, a difference of 7.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Pima |
Minimum | 50.8% | 9.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.2% | 90.7% |
Mean | 76.4% | 73.8% |
Median | 76.0% | 78.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.8% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.4% | 83.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 22.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 22.3% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Dutch West Indian (80.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Seminole (80.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Sioux (80.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.2%), Hopi (77.0%, a difference of 2.9%), Lumbee (77.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and Yup'ik (77.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |