Scotch-Irish vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Pima
16.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
39.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,237,473 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 69.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Pima |
Minimum | 8.9% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.1% | 89.0% |
Mean | 36.0% | 41.2% |
Median | 24.2% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.0% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.6% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Portugal (16.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.6%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Iraq (16.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Syria (16.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Hawaiian (16.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 43.1 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 42.5 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 35.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.7% |
South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |