Immigrants from Guatemala vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Pima
21.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,986,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 29.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Pima |
Minimum | 3.5% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 69.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 65.5% | 89.0% |
Mean | 30.9% | 41.2% |
Median | 28.1% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.1% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.9% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.27%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |