Sioux vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Sioux
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sioux
Pima
25.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,838,275 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 25.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 10.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sioux | Pima |
Minimum | 1.8% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.2% | 89.0% |
Mean | 45.0% | 41.2% |
Median | 35.9% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.5% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.6% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 45.1% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.7% | 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 2.2%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Crow (26.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |