Nonimmigrants vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Pima
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,419,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 54.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Pima |
Minimum | 7.6% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.6% | 89.0% |
Mean | 17.9% | 41.2% |
Median | 17.4% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |