Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Pima
19.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,787,777 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 46.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Pima |
Minimum | 3.9% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.1% | 89.0% |
Mean | 21.4% | 41.2% |
Median | 18.2% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |