Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,919 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 34.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.8% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 44.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.0% | 88.9% |
Mean | 18.7% | 35.8% |
Median | 17.2% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |