Armenian vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Luxembourger
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Luxembourgers
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,765,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 11.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 10.2% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 52.1% |
| Range | 53.3% | 41.9% |
| Mean | 18.8% | 21.8% |
| Median | 16.5% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |