Lebanese vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lebanese
Chickasaw
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 394,403,389 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 26.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lebanese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.5% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.5% | 88.9% |
Mean | 34.4% | 35.8% |
Median | 21.5% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.8% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.4% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.2% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.7% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |