Panamanian vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Panamanian
Chickasaw
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Panamanians
Chickasaw
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,035,493 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.11%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.6% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 49.6% | 62.8% |
Range | 45.0% | 56.3% |
Mean | 24.4% | 27.4% |
Median | 25.4% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.4% | 30.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Chickasaw by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Liberian (28.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Kenyans | 99.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Nicaraguans | 99.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Costa Ricans | 99.8 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |