Panamanian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Panamanian
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Panamanians
Chickasaw
17.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
8.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,653,612 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 11.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 90.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 85.2% | 96.2% |
Mean | 22.3% | 26.8% |
Median | 17.9% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Hmong (17.5%, a difference of 0.59%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.90%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |