Crow vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
COMPARE
Crow
Chickasaw
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Comparison
Crow
Chickasaw
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 60 TO 64 YEARS
9.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 60 TO 64 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,549,079 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,083,828 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 14.5%.
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 26.4% | 47.6% |
Range | 24.6% | 46.3% |
Mean | 8.2% | 10.5% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 15.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Demographics Similar to Crow by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Ottawa (4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Brazil (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years |
Cajuns | 12.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 4.9% |
Koreans | 12.2 /100 | #217 | Poor 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 12.0 /100 | #218 | Poor 4.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 11.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 4.9% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #220 | Poor 4.9% |
Ugandans | 10.5 /100 | #221 | Poor 4.9% |
Brazilians | 10.1 /100 | #222 | Poor 5.0% |
Crow | 9.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 8.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 7.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 6.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.0% |
Nigerians | 6.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 6.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.0% |
Africans | 5.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Cuba (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Norwegian (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Sudanese (4.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Danish (4.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (4.4%, a difference of 0.97%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.4% |