Crow vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Crow
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Crow
Chickasaw
$31,729
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,209,980 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.513 and weighted average of $31,729. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 15.0%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $9,914 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $42,917 | $42,047 |
| Range | $33,003 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $23,129 | $28,009 |
| Median | $21,705 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $18,390 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $29,346 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $10,956 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $8,112 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $7,999 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Crow by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Pueblo ($32,012, a difference of 0.89%), Puerto Rican ($31,268, a difference of 1.5%), Hopi ($31,177, a difference of 1.8%), Arapaho ($32,345, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima ($30,644, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic $33,696 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic $33,279 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic $33,236 |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic $33,009 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic $32,996 |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic $32,345 |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic $32,012 |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic $31,729 |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic $31,268 |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic $31,177 |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic $30,644 |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic $30,518 |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic $30,256 |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic $29,845 |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic $29,031 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |