Iroquois vs Australian Family Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Australian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Iroquois
Australians
62.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Australian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,819 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 62.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,034,220 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 0.97%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Australian |
Minimum | 26.6% | 31.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.4% |
Range | 73.4% | 50.9% |
Mean | 64.2% | 64.8% |
Median | 64.2% | 64.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.2% | 60.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.0% | 70.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Australians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Cree (62.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (62.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Albania (62.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Kuwait (62.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Africa (62.4%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Latvian (62.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Uganda (62.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Nepal (62.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 62.4% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |