South American Indian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.69%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.098% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 11.9% |
| Range | 16.2% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 3.5% |
| Median | 4.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |