Dutch West Indian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
4.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,766,796 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 47.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 16.1% | 11.9% |
Range | 13.9% | 10.6% |
Mean | 6.5% | 3.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 1.3%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |