Immigrants from Europe vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Europe
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Europe
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
22.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Europe vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,917,767 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 6.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Europe | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.95% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 11.9% |
Range | 99.1% | 10.6% |
Mean | 9.4% | 3.5% |
Median | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Croatia (3.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |