South American Indian vs Liberian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Liberian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Liberians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Liberian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,050,307 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.50%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Liberian |
Minimum | 0.098% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 7.4% |
Range | 16.2% | 6.9% |
Mean | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Median | 4.0% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 0.91% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Liberians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Bahamian (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |