Immigrants from the Azores vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,255,123 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 28.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.28% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 9.9% | 11.9% |
Range | 9.6% | 10.6% |
Mean | 4.0% | 3.5% |
Median | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |