Sierra Leonean vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,339,030 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.429 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 15.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.31% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 4.8% | 11.9% |
Range | 4.5% | 10.6% |
Mean | 2.4% | 3.5% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |