South American Indian vs Immigrants Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Immigrants Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,876,891 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.84%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Immigrants |
Minimum | 0.098% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 13.1% |
Range | 16.2% | 12.2% |
Mean | 4.1% | 2.9% |
Median | 4.0% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 0.95% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Immigrants by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |