South American Indian vs Jordanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Jordanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Jordanians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Jordanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.63%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.098% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 6.7% |
| Range | 16.2% | 6.2% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 2.9% |
| Median | 4.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |