Russian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Russian
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Russians
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,868,935 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.73% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 18.2% | 11.9% |
Range | 17.5% | 10.6% |
Mean | 5.2% | 3.5% |
Median | 3.8% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Russians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |