Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs South African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
South African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
South Africans
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs South African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,807,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,615 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | South African |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 18.9% | 27.3% |
Range | 17.8% | 27.0% |
Mean | 4.3% | 5.7% |
Median | 3.2% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |