Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Ethiopian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Ethiopians
10.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,609 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,074,665 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.020%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 2.2% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 23.3% | 23.4% |
Range | 21.1% | 19.4% |
Mean | 10.3% | 10.2% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Ethiopians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Macedonian (10.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Korean (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (10.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Austria | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Macedonians | 97.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 97.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Zimbabweans | 97.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Brazilians | 96.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 96.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Tongans | 96.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |