Creek vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,628,470 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $112,175, a difference of 42.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $105,089, a difference of 40.4%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $49,893, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,638, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $41,771, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.6%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 58.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.84%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 69.7%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 65.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%).