Cuban vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,592,747 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $65,854, a difference of 34.0%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $110,011, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $106,849, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $40,798, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 92.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 67.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 37.3%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.58%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 65.0%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 46.8%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.0%).