Japanese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Japanese
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Japanese
Zimbabweans
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Japanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,112,013 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Zimbabweans.
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $45,804, a difference of 14.9%), householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.7%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $110,011, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $40,798, a difference of 5.9%), and median earnings ($44,825 compared to $48,229, a difference of 7.6%).
Income Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,870 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,288 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,395 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,825 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,473 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,528 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,365 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,624 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,834 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,919 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Fair 26.3% |
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Poverty Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.8%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.35 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 6.4% |
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 93.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.9% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.7% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Japanese vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.7%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Disability Metric | Japanese | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |