Immigrants from Ecuador vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,444,975 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $65,854, a difference of 21.9%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $110,011, a difference of 18.5%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $51,259, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $40,798, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $48,229, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 65.4%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 58.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.3%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 163.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 52.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 41.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 51.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.7%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.71%), male disability (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.3%).