Samoan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Samoan
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Samoans
Zimbabweans
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Samoan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,622,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Zimbabweans.
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $45,804, a difference of 15.0%), median family income ($100,344 compared to $110,011, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $56,302, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.65%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $90,618, a difference of 4.8%).
Income Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,826 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,344 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,498 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,206 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,389 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,498 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,610 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,385 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,580 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,427 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Poverty Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.8% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.5% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.3% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.42 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.6% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.0% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.2% | Good 6.4% |
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.3%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.8% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.0% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.1% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Samoan vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Samoan | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.5% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |