Cuban vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cuban
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cubans
Burmese
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Cuban Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,992,278 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Burmese.
Cuban vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $123,369, a difference of 45.2%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $71,139, a difference of 44.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $121,444, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $54,800, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $44,911, a difference of 28.5%).
Income Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,383 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,981 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,392 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,619 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,580 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,942 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,655 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,483 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,301 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,152 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.3% | Tragic 28.0% |
Cuban vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 110.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.1%).
Poverty Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.2% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Cuban vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cuban vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.92%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.5% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Cuban vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.4% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.4% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Cuban vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.5% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.3% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Cuban vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 91.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 63.2%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.6% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.9% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cuban vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Cuban | Burmese |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |