Cuban vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,807,478 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $114,553, a difference of 34.8%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $65,326, a difference of 32.9%), and per capita income ($37,383 compared to $49,173, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $42,542, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 74.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 48.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.3%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 41.1%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 54.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 100.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 60.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%).