Cuban vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Zimbabweans
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,584,431 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 7.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 59.7% |
| Range | 41.1% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 18.9% |
| Median | 20.6% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |