Maltese vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Maltese
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Maltese
Celtics
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,419,200 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 24.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Celtic |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.7% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 25.4% | 33.1% |
| Median | 17.4% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.9% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |