Cape Verdean vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Celtics
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,029,522 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.66% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 50.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.8% | 88.9% |
Mean | 23.0% | 33.1% |
Median | 23.1% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.9% | 39.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.070%), French (22.2%, a difference of 0.14%), West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |