U.S. Virgin Islander vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Celtics
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,304,073 people shows no correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 6.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Celtic |
Minimum | 5.4% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 51.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.0% | 88.9% |
Mean | 25.0% | 33.1% |
Median | 23.5% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.7% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 39.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |