Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Celtics
22.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,274,747 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 0.70%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Celtic |
Minimum | 8.5% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 52.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.5% | 88.9% |
Mean | 24.5% | 33.1% |
Median | 23.1% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 39.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Liberia (22.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Delaware (22.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |