Syrian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Syrian
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Syrians
Celtics
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
76.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,279,372 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 6.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Syrian | Celtic |
Minimum | 3.7% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 70.9% |
Range | 76.2% | 67.6% |
Mean | 17.4% | 25.7% |
Median | 14.0% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |