Sioux vs Pima Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sioux
Pima
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sioux
Pima
20.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Pima Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,087,584 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653 and weighted average of 20.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,212 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 12.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Pima |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 79.5% |
| Range | 96.5% | 73.8% |
| Mean | 34.8% | 28.6% |
| Median | 26.7% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 37.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 33.0% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.5% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Pima by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and Cheyenne (20.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.3%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |