Nonimmigrants vs Comanche Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Comanche
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Comanche
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Comanche Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,419,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,392,517 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 10.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Comanche |
Minimum | 7.6% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 50.0% |
Range | 31.6% | 44.4% |
Mean | 17.9% | 26.3% |
Median | 17.4% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 38.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |