Native/Alaskan vs Tohono O'odham Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Tohono O'odham
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Tohono O'odham
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Tohono O'odham Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,476,258 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,715,136 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 25.9%, a difference of 35.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 87.1% |
| Range | 48.2% | 85.7% |
| Mean | 25.5% | 36.5% |
| Median | 23.5% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.8% | 50.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 27.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 20.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Tohono O'odham by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Apache (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 0.76%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 3.0%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 8.6%), Pima (23.6%, a difference of 10.0%), Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 13.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |