Mongolian vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
White/Caucasian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Whites/Caucasians
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 12.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 3.5% | 18.3% |
Maximum | 47.1% | 38.3% |
Range | 43.6% | 20.0% |
Mean | 19.9% | 24.3% |
Median | 19.2% | 24.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 26.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |