Jordanian vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
White/Caucasian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Whites/Caucasians
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 20.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 18.3% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 38.3% |
Range | 33.7% | 20.0% |
Mean | 17.3% | 24.3% |
Median | 17.8% | 24.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 26.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |