Tongan vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
White/Caucasian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Whites/Caucasians
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,377,778 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 20.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 18.3% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 38.3% |
| Range | 41.5% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 24.3% |
| Median | 18.2% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 26.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tongans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |