Iraqi vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iraqi
White/Caucasian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iraqis
Whites/Caucasians
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,824,152 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 9.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iraqi | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.98% | 18.3% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 38.3% |
| Range | 44.5% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 21.3% | 24.3% |
| Median | 20.2% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 26.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iraqis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |