Mongolian vs African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Africans
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,525,497 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 24.8%, a difference of 22.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | African |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 60.3% |
| Range | 43.6% | 58.4% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 28.3% |
| Median | 19.2% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 34.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Central America (24.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.48%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and American (24.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |